Thanks Kenny! I understand it's not 100% accurate, so I'm hoping for a moult sometime soon so I can look that way. When I look at Karina's ventral area, there doesn't seem to be any "noticeable" hairs in that area at all, it appears very smooth.
Thanks Kenny! I understand it's not 100% accurate, so I'm hoping for a moult sometime soon so I can look that way. When I look at Karina's ventral area, there doesn't seem to be any "noticeable" hairs in that area at all, it appears very smooth.
thank you Atx13 Very informative linkhttp://www.seriousbite.com/sexing_your_tarantula.htm (or you can go off of what Kenny has already posted on here)
Me personally, I dont even try to sex anything under 2.5"- 3"... But as for the smallest you can sex.. you can sex a 1.5"-2" T with a microscope and a moult...
It also depends on the species. I can accurately sex G pulchra at 1" but G pulchripes can't be determined until nearly 2". A lot depends on when the species develops the spermathecae. A good microscope is a must for early gender determination. As for ventral sexing, again species develop at different rates, can be accurately done by the 3" mark.hi all can you tell me what is the smallest / youngest a T can be for you to be able to tell the sex ? .
My question is, what makes a Pulchripes so much harder to sex than a Pulchra?It also depends on the species. I can accurately sex G pulchra at 1" but G pulchripes can't be determined until nearly 2". A lot depends on when the species develops the spermathecae. A good microscope is a must for early gender determination. As for ventral sexing, again species develop at different rates, can be accurately done by the 3" mark.
Gotcha, thanks Scool!G pulchripes seem to take longer to develop visible spermathecae. I have witnessed it in 1.5" specimen but it translucent and nearly invisible.
well no luck so far red knee and Trinidad Cheveron both moulted but was too small and fell apart will have to wait for the Salmon Pink to moult