The convexity and lack of fusillae tell me female.Males or females? Sorry about quality. View attachment 19608 View attachment 19609
Lol. I'll be happy if at least one of my juveniles turn out to be female!Advice given to me recently was.....
"Usually, the females book lung spacing is closer together (top left is close to bottom left and top right is closer to bottom right) but there is a wider space between the bottom two book lungs.
Males are the opposite. The top left and bottom left have more space between them and so on for the top right & bottom right. The bottom set of book lungs tend to be "closer" together"
Based on this principle, Male on top and female on the bottom (so missionary style. ....lol)
Lol. I'll be happy if at least one of my juveniles turn out to be female!
MaleHow about this one? Any guesses? View attachment 20862 View attachment 20863
Here's another bad View attachment 23746 photo of the very top Tarantula.
@Casey K: is that last pic an opening or a light reflex. I think I see a lightly pigmented epiandrous fusillae and a vertical arthordial membrane. How am I seeing this wrong. Thanks in advance!!
Ahhh. I'm no master, lol. I make mistakes. I go off of book lung spacing, shape of furrow, exuvium, and some dorsal definition with certain species. I am pretty good with brachy's, though.Thanks @Casey K. I thought it would be wise to learn from the Master!
What species is this?Here's another bad View attachment 23746 photo of the very top Tarantula.
B. smithi. I'll try for another photo. I never use flash, just a horrible phone photo.What species is this?
He had his mature molt and is definitely male. He's a G. pulchripes.Male