Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New articles
New media comments
New article comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Light Theme
Contact us
Close Menu
Are you a Tarantula hobbyist? If so, we invite you to join our community! Once you join you'll be able to post messages, upload pictures of your pets and enclosures and chat with other Tarantula enthusiasts.
Sign up today!
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
Please act now to save the hobby!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DustyD" data-source="post: 209543" data-attributes="member: 36911"><p>More fear mongering from Padraig Sea who has previously stated that the amendment has nothing to do with conservation and that the federal government wants to prohibit all exotic pets.</p><p>I am not saying this is good or bad legislation. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Based on what you provided and contrary to what you state, there are provisions for input and stipulations that species that have been previously imported in the previous year in more than minimal numbers would not be prohibited, unless they posed a danger.</p><p>The provisions of the amendment would prohibit species UNLESS:</p><p></p><p>"(A) during the 1-year period preceding the date of enactment of the America COMPETES Act of 2022, the species was, in more than minimal quantities‘‘(i) imported into the United States; or ‘‘(ii) transported between the States, any territory of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any possession of the United States; or</p><p></p><p>(And here is the public input provision)</p><p>‘‘(B) the Secretary of the Interior determines, after an opportunity for public comment, that the species does not pose a significant risk of invasiveness to the United States and publishes a notice in the Federal Register of the determination."</p></blockquote><p>Today USFWS is denying entry to animals from over a dozen countries on the basis that they were never exported legally. In many cases these are species that have already been imported to the US in the tens of thousands, and where there is ample evidence that founder stock was exported legally.[/QUOTE]</p><p></p><p></p><p>Which species? Chile is banning exports of some of it's tarantulas which thereby requires the US FWS to block their entry too. And I would think that tens of thousands of animals would qualify as more than minimal.</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="DustyD, post: 209543, member: 36911"] More fear mongering from Padraig Sea who has previously stated that the amendment has nothing to do with conservation and that the federal government wants to prohibit all exotic pets. I am not saying this is good or bad legislation. Based on what you provided and contrary to what you state, there are provisions for input and stipulations that species that have been previously imported in the previous year in more than minimal numbers would not be prohibited, unless they posed a danger. The provisions of the amendment would prohibit species UNLESS: "(A) during the 1-year period preceding the date of enactment of the America COMPETES Act of 2022, the species was, in more than minimal quantities‘‘(i) imported into the United States; or ‘‘(ii) transported between the States, any territory of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any possession of the United States; or (And here is the public input provision) ‘‘(B) the Secretary of the Interior determines, after an opportunity for public comment, that the species does not pose a significant risk of invasiveness to the United States and publishes a notice in the Federal Register of the determination." [/QUOTE] Today USFWS is denying entry to animals from over a dozen countries on the basis that they were never exported legally. In many cases these are species that have already been imported to the US in the tens of thousands, and where there is ample evidence that founder stock was exported legally.[/QUOTE] Which species? Chile is banning exports of some of it's tarantulas which thereby requires the US FWS to block their entry too. And I would think that tens of thousands of animals would qualify as more than minimal. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
Please act now to save the hobby!
Top