Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New articles
New media comments
New article comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
Contact us
Close Menu
Are you a Tarantula hobbyist? If so, we invite you to join our community! Once you join you'll be able to post messages, upload pictures of your pets and enclosures and chat with other Tarantula enthusiasts.
Sign up today!
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
Please act now to save the hobby!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DustyD" data-source="post: 209419" data-attributes="member: 36911"><p>[USER=14430]@Padraig Sea[/USER] </p><p></p><p>You stated:</p><p>"Make no mistake: this has nothing to do with invasive species or conservation."</p><p></p><p>You are clearly wrong and hyping the matter. </p><p></p><p>It has everything to do with invasive species!</p><p>Almost identical wording was discussed in a Senate committee last year, proposed by a Democrat and Sen. Marco Rubio, a Republican from Florida where invasive species have become a huge problem.</p><p></p><p>It is fine to oppose legislation, but please do it without fanning the mob mentality. It is comments like yours that lead to wild stories that people are already dumping or considering dumping their animals because of this bill that is not even a law yet.</p><p></p><p>You said: " It literally means that if they decide your tarantula, scorpion or centipede could survive in Florida, it is an injurious species and cannot be transported across ANY state line for ANY reason."</p><p></p><p>My response: Some states, maybe many, already have restrictions in place on what exotic animals you can own. So some of that is already in place.</p><p></p><p>I don't know if this bill is the right approach or not. What I do know is that invasive species are already wreaking havoc with some of our ecosystems. And without action, it will only get worse. </p><p></p><p>Stirring up emotions and creating that mob mentality, is not the solution.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DustyD, post: 209419, member: 36911"] [USER=14430]@Padraig Sea[/USER] You stated: "Make no mistake: this has nothing to do with invasive species or conservation." You are clearly wrong and hyping the matter. It has everything to do with invasive species! Almost identical wording was discussed in a Senate committee last year, proposed by a Democrat and Sen. Marco Rubio, a Republican from Florida where invasive species have become a huge problem. It is fine to oppose legislation, but please do it without fanning the mob mentality. It is comments like yours that lead to wild stories that people are already dumping or considering dumping their animals because of this bill that is not even a law yet. You said: " It literally means that if they decide your tarantula, scorpion or centipede could survive in Florida, it is an injurious species and cannot be transported across ANY state line for ANY reason." My response: Some states, maybe many, already have restrictions in place on what exotic animals you can own. So some of that is already in place. I don't know if this bill is the right approach or not. What I do know is that invasive species are already wreaking havoc with some of our ecosystems. And without action, it will only get worse. Stirring up emotions and creating that mob mentality, is not the solution. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
Please act now to save the hobby!
Top