Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New articles
New media comments
New article comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
Contact us
Close Menu
Are you a Tarantula hobbyist? If so, we invite you to join our community! Once you join you'll be able to post messages, upload pictures of your pets and enclosures and chat with other Tarantula enthusiasts.
Sign up today!
Forums
Welcome to Tarantula Forum!
Introductions
Hi! Need community support!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eighth Eye Blind" data-source="post: 243162" data-attributes="member: 49683"><p>One easy way to tell if it's a <em>Calisoga</em> is to piss it off and let it bite you. </p><p></p><p><em>Calisoga</em> venom isn't quite up to the level of an old world species, but it does command much greater respect than the wimpy nibble of an <em>Aphonopelma</em>. I've never taken a hit from one, but people I know say that it's more like a hornet string than the typical honey bee pain that a new world species deals out.</p><p></p><p>It's not, of course, the recommended way to distinguish the genus but it will get the job done in a pinch (pun intended).</p><p></p><p></p><p>^^^ This.</p><p></p><p>Spider taxonomy is one of the most difficult subjects there is. <em>Humans</em> can't agree on a lot of it. AI is 90% useless for this kind of thing (at least until it gets much. much more training on the subject).</p><p></p><p>As an example, there was a species of California tarantula first identified in the 1870's and named <em>Eurypelma californicum</em>. People studied these for decades - well into the 2000's, in fact - and they became something of a standard model for looking at the circulatory system of spiders.</p><p></p><p>Well, it turns out there's no such thing as a <em>Eurypelma californicum. </em>Somebody took a closer look about fifteen years ago and realized that what everybody was calling <em>E. californicum </em>was actually just a local variant of the species <em>Aphonopelma hentzi - </em>one of the most common tarantulas in the US<em>.</em> Several hundred research papers now have to be reevaluated to try and straighten it all out.</p><p></p><p>Experts in the field blew the ID on <em>E. californicum</em> for 140 years. There's no way anybody should trust AI about tarantula taxonomy. It'll be another decade or two before AI is smart enough to figure it out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eighth Eye Blind, post: 243162, member: 49683"] One easy way to tell if it's a [I]Calisoga[/I] is to piss it off and let it bite you. [I]Calisoga[/I] venom isn't quite up to the level of an old world species, but it does command much greater respect than the wimpy nibble of an [I]Aphonopelma[/I]. I've never taken a hit from one, but people I know say that it's more like a hornet string than the typical honey bee pain that a new world species deals out. It's not, of course, the recommended way to distinguish the genus but it will get the job done in a pinch (pun intended). ^^^ This. Spider taxonomy is one of the most difficult subjects there is. [I]Humans[/I] can't agree on a lot of it. AI is 90% useless for this kind of thing (at least until it gets much. much more training on the subject). As an example, there was a species of California tarantula first identified in the 1870's and named [I]Eurypelma californicum[/I]. People studied these for decades - well into the 2000's, in fact - and they became something of a standard model for looking at the circulatory system of spiders. Well, it turns out there's no such thing as a [I]Eurypelma californicum. [/I]Somebody took a closer look about fifteen years ago and realized that what everybody was calling [I]E. californicum [/I]was actually just a local variant of the species [I]Aphonopelma hentzi - [/I]one of the most common tarantulas in the US[I].[/I] Several hundred research papers now have to be reevaluated to try and straighten it all out. Experts in the field blew the ID on [I]E. californicum[/I] for 140 years. There's no way anybody should trust AI about tarantula taxonomy. It'll be another decade or two before AI is smart enough to figure it out. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Welcome to Tarantula Forum!
Introductions
Hi! Need community support!
Top