Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New articles
New media comments
New article comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
Contact us
Close Menu
Are you a Tarantula hobbyist? If so, we invite you to join our community! Once you join you'll be able to post messages, upload pictures of your pets and enclosures and chat with other Tarantula enthusiasts.
Sign up today!
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
Conservation the good,the bad and the ugly
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Martin Oosthuysen" data-source="post: 24006" data-attributes="member: 1070"><p>- permits have longterm positive effects,controlling and monitoring of specimens.</p><p>- in the future more strict measures will be enforced with transgressors.</p><p>- husbandry skills of lower standards,are inhumane towards the captive specimens.</p><p></p><p>Okay,all of the above makes perfect sense. Again now I return to what I've said, having a governing body would allow easy monitoring of specimens held captive. Also of how they are held captive, natcon could say if you're not part of this initiative you're outside natcons blanket. A set of standards could be implemented as this bodies set guidelines, thus growing more trust from natcon. This could educate people to the fact that natcon is not out to get them,but educate them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Martin Oosthuysen, post: 24006, member: 1070"] - permits have longterm positive effects,controlling and monitoring of specimens. - in the future more strict measures will be enforced with transgressors. - husbandry skills of lower standards,are inhumane towards the captive specimens. Okay,all of the above makes perfect sense. Again now I return to what I've said, having a governing body would allow easy monitoring of specimens held captive. Also of how they are held captive, natcon could say if you're not part of this initiative you're outside natcons blanket. A set of standards could be implemented as this bodies set guidelines, thus growing more trust from natcon. This could educate people to the fact that natcon is not out to get them,but educate them. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
Conservation the good,the bad and the ugly
Top