Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New articles
New media comments
New article comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Light Theme
Contact us
Close Menu
Are you a Tarantula hobbyist? If so, we invite you to join our community! Once you join you'll be able to post messages, upload pictures of your pets and enclosures and chat with other Tarantula enthusiasts.
Sign up today!
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
Brachypelma angustum
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="m0lsx" data-source="post: 160381" data-attributes="member: 29323"><p>Whilst at Bedford a few weeks ago I brought a Brachypelma angustum from a well known dealer there. Yet online information suggests that that in 1980 it was described as Sericopelma angustum by <a href="https://www.tarantupedia.com/theraphosinae/sericopelma/carlos-e-valerio" target="_blank">Carlos E. Valerio</a>. </p><p></p><p>Wiki which is not the best source for factual infomation, also suggests that the T's sold as Brachypelma angustum since the early 1990's may not be Sericopelma angustum. To confuse me even more.</p><p></p><p>Is there any logical reason behind these T's being sold as a Brachypelma & not as a Sericopelm?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="m0lsx, post: 160381, member: 29323"] Whilst at Bedford a few weeks ago I brought a Brachypelma angustum from a well known dealer there. Yet online information suggests that that in 1980 it was described as Sericopelma angustum by [URL='https://www.tarantupedia.com/theraphosinae/sericopelma/carlos-e-valerio']Carlos E. Valerio[/URL]. Wiki which is not the best source for factual infomation, also suggests that the T's sold as Brachypelma angustum since the early 1990's may not be Sericopelma angustum. To confuse me even more. Is there any logical reason behind these T's being sold as a Brachypelma & not as a Sericopelm? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
Brachypelma angustum
Top