Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New articles
New media comments
New article comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
Contact us
Close Menu
Are you a Tarantula hobbyist? If so, we invite you to join our community! Once you join you'll be able to post messages, upload pictures of your pets and enclosures and chat with other Tarantula enthusiasts.
Sign up today!
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
READ: Creatures from the North.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eighth Eye Blind" data-source="post: 242177" data-attributes="member: 49683"><p>The CITES appendices and the EU annexes aren't identical. CITES only sets the minimum protections that signatories have to employ. Signatories are always able to increase protections beyond what CITES calls for.</p><p></p><p>A good example is the US listing five species of <em>Poecilotheria</em> as endangered which gives them effectively the same protection as CITES Appendix I even though they're actually listed in CITES Appendix II. The EU annexes work the same way so a species that's on CITES Appendix II and wouldn't normally need a permit for intra-EU transfer could still be banned from commerce inside the EU if it's on EU Annex A.</p><p></p><p>All <em>Brachypelma</em> species were added to CITES Appendix II back in the 1990's but they didn't get red listed by IUCN and bumped up in protection status until 2019. Ergo, <em>Brachypelma</em> you bought in the past may not have needed permits for EU-to-EU sales but may require them today.</p><p></p><p>Yeah, it's a complicated mess, but that's part of the point. The harder it is to get the permits the more incentive there is to captive-breed locally and reduce the strain on wild populations.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eighth Eye Blind, post: 242177, member: 49683"] The CITES appendices and the EU annexes aren't identical. CITES only sets the minimum protections that signatories have to employ. Signatories are always able to increase protections beyond what CITES calls for. A good example is the US listing five species of [I]Poecilotheria[/I] as endangered which gives them effectively the same protection as CITES Appendix I even though they're actually listed in CITES Appendix II. The EU annexes work the same way so a species that's on CITES Appendix II and wouldn't normally need a permit for intra-EU transfer could still be banned from commerce inside the EU if it's on EU Annex A. All [I]Brachypelma[/I] species were added to CITES Appendix II back in the 1990's but they didn't get red listed by IUCN and bumped up in protection status until 2019. Ergo, [I]Brachypelma[/I] you bought in the past may not have needed permits for EU-to-EU sales but may require them today. Yeah, it's a complicated mess, but that's part of the point. The harder it is to get the permits the more incentive there is to captive-breed locally and reduce the strain on wild populations. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
READ: Creatures from the North.
Top