Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New articles
New media comments
New article comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
Contact us
Close Menu
Are you a Tarantula hobbyist? If so, we invite you to join our community! Once you join you'll be able to post messages, upload pictures of your pets and enclosures and chat with other Tarantula enthusiasts.
Sign up today!
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
question on handling
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ghost" data-source="post: 43907" data-attributes="member: 3461"><p>I 100% agree with you on this Threasoid one of the reasons that im anti-handling is not to give the animal rights activists anymore ammunition when it comes to getting the keeping of exotics banned.</p><p>Here in the UK we already have a thing called the Dangerous Wild Animal Licence(DWAL) which was introduced to stop just anyone from owning animals that were considerd life threatening without keeping them in proper enclosures and not being a public liability,now over the years alot of species have been added that puts alot of exotics out of the reach of quite a few hobbyist due to the cost of the licence and public liability insurance.</p><p>Now there are currently no Tarantulas on the list of DWAL species but there is a huge list of Scorpions on it and alot of them don't have anymore powerful venom than say S.calceatum or H.macs do so it wouldn't take too many people to get bit by one of them and have to vist the ER for them to get added to the DWAL list.</p><p>This is something that people should consider when they talk about handling that it could end up putting the whole hobby at risk just for the sake of them wanting to hold a big hairy spider....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ghost, post: 43907, member: 3461"] I 100% agree with you on this Threasoid one of the reasons that im anti-handling is not to give the animal rights activists anymore ammunition when it comes to getting the keeping of exotics banned. Here in the UK we already have a thing called the Dangerous Wild Animal Licence(DWAL) which was introduced to stop just anyone from owning animals that were considerd life threatening without keeping them in proper enclosures and not being a public liability,now over the years alot of species have been added that puts alot of exotics out of the reach of quite a few hobbyist due to the cost of the licence and public liability insurance. Now there are currently no Tarantulas on the list of DWAL species but there is a huge list of Scorpions on it and alot of them don't have anymore powerful venom than say S.calceatum or H.macs do so it wouldn't take too many people to get bit by one of them and have to vist the ER for them to get added to the DWAL list. This is something that people should consider when they talk about handling that it could end up putting the whole hobby at risk just for the sake of them wanting to hold a big hairy spider.... [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
question on handling
Top