Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New articles
New media comments
New article comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
Contact us
Close Menu
Are you a Tarantula hobbyist? If so, we invite you to join our community! Once you join you'll be able to post messages, upload pictures of your pets and enclosures and chat with other Tarantula enthusiasts.
Sign up today!
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
Tarantula Breeding
New hybrid to avoid
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thistles" data-source="post: 128956" data-attributes="member: 3949"><p>You're wrong about mother nature. Most hybrids produced in the hobby would never meet in the wild. They're closely related, but they've speciated due to geography. A cambridgei and an irminia are recently diverged, hence the fertility, but would never meet in the wild because their ranges don't overlap. The ones that are duds are typically the ones that are so far apart that they can share ranges without producing natural hybrids. When this sort of thing (geography changes etc) occurs in nature and closely related species are brought together, there's an extinction of one or both.</p><p></p><p>Then you say "should breed." How is that optimal? "Could" would be one thing, but you jump all the way to "possible therefore SHOULD." Does no evaluation of priorities come into play? Would the hobby prefer to have 2 distinct species or one mix? I know where I come down on that.</p><p></p><p>The hobby hybrids are unnatural. If they weren't, they would be present in the wild. "I aint interested" in disagreement is a terrible attitude regardless of the issue up for debate. You might be wrong, and if you don't listen to others you'll continue to be wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thistles, post: 128956, member: 3949"] You're wrong about mother nature. Most hybrids produced in the hobby would never meet in the wild. They're closely related, but they've speciated due to geography. A cambridgei and an irminia are recently diverged, hence the fertility, but would never meet in the wild because their ranges don't overlap. The ones that are duds are typically the ones that are so far apart that they can share ranges without producing natural hybrids. When this sort of thing (geography changes etc) occurs in nature and closely related species are brought together, there's an extinction of one or both. Then you say "should breed." How is that optimal? "Could" would be one thing, but you jump all the way to "possible therefore SHOULD." Does no evaluation of priorities come into play? Would the hobby prefer to have 2 distinct species or one mix? I know where I come down on that. The hobby hybrids are unnatural. If they weren't, they would be present in the wild. "I aint interested" in disagreement is a terrible attitude regardless of the issue up for debate. You might be wrong, and if you don't listen to others you'll continue to be wrong. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
Tarantula Breeding
New hybrid to avoid
Top