Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New articles
New media comments
New article comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
Contact us
Close Menu
Are you a Tarantula hobbyist? If so, we invite you to join our community! Once you join you'll be able to post messages, upload pictures of your pets and enclosures and chat with other Tarantula enthusiasts.
Sign up today!
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
How dangerous are medically significant Ts?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kevin Levites" data-source="post: 210490" data-attributes="member: 11901"><p>First, if I came off as a fear-monger, I sincerely apologize.</p><p></p><p>I do believe I used words like "highly unlikely" and that the risk of a pet dog bringing ticks into the house is much more medically significant than a pet tarantula bite. I also said that I've never even heard of anyone who has treated an allergic reaction to a tarantula bite.</p><p></p><p>I hoped that my statements would have been taken in context.</p><p></p><p>I still stand by everything I said . . . and further, I believe that the tarantula hobby is extremely vital for the sake of humanity.</p><p></p><p>There are several medications that come from animal venom. Byetta is a med used to treat a heart condition called atrial fibrillation, and it comes from the pygmie rattlesnake. There are medications for diabetes and parkinson's disease that are being refined from the venom of the gila monster, and venom from the copperhead snake may hold a cure for cancer called "contortostatin."</p><p></p><p>We are in the middle of a human-caused mass extinction, and tarantula species have a better chance of survival if they're being kept as pets.</p><p></p><p>As another example, consider the Spix Macaw. It was driven into total extinction in the wild, andthe species only exists today because of about 45 birds that were pets, and repatriated back to Brazil for a breeding program . . . and now, we are up to about 300 birds.</p><p></p><p>Certain animals are very charismatic, like the excessively cute and endangered Hawaiian monk seal, so when an appeal goes out for resources to protect them, the dollars roll in.</p><p></p><p>Yet if we try to raise a similar appeal for snakes, tarantulas, and scorpions . . . we would be lucky to see a dime.</p><p></p><p>Yet it's these "nasty animals" that may hold an ultimate cure for cancer.</p><p></p><p>So no . . . I don't intend to be a fear monger.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kevin Levites, post: 210490, member: 11901"] First, if I came off as a fear-monger, I sincerely apologize. I do believe I used words like "highly unlikely" and that the risk of a pet dog bringing ticks into the house is much more medically significant than a pet tarantula bite. I also said that I've never even heard of anyone who has treated an allergic reaction to a tarantula bite. I hoped that my statements would have been taken in context. I still stand by everything I said . . . and further, I believe that the tarantula hobby is extremely vital for the sake of humanity. There are several medications that come from animal venom. Byetta is a med used to treat a heart condition called atrial fibrillation, and it comes from the pygmie rattlesnake. There are medications for diabetes and parkinson's disease that are being refined from the venom of the gila monster, and venom from the copperhead snake may hold a cure for cancer called "contortostatin." We are in the middle of a human-caused mass extinction, and tarantula species have a better chance of survival if they're being kept as pets. As another example, consider the Spix Macaw. It was driven into total extinction in the wild, andthe species only exists today because of about 45 birds that were pets, and repatriated back to Brazil for a breeding program . . . and now, we are up to about 300 birds. Certain animals are very charismatic, like the excessively cute and endangered Hawaiian monk seal, so when an appeal goes out for resources to protect them, the dollars roll in. Yet if we try to raise a similar appeal for snakes, tarantulas, and scorpions . . . we would be lucky to see a dime. Yet it's these "nasty animals" that may hold an ultimate cure for cancer. So no . . . I don't intend to be a fear monger. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
How dangerous are medically significant Ts?
Top