Reply to thread

Where exactly is it that out of the two of us I am "clearly wrong in parts"? It is not a matter of opinion that I am 100% correct, it's a fact. No matter how I went about pointing it out, you weren't clear, and I said as much. That's all any of this, for me, was about. There is no dispute there, you've admitted you weren't clear, you know you weren't. That's the end of it.

Now... what is there to drop? If you keep responding to me about the same topic, I am going to respond back about said topic. That's how it works. I was ready to move on after my second post in this thread, but you responded in a way that invited a response back, over and over again. Why am I just supposed to not respond to whatever you say to me? How does that make sense? Those are all rhetorical questions, in case that is not clear to you.

Believe me when I say I am very sorry I ever came across your thread and saw your poorly worded post. If I could take back ever bothering to respond, I would in a heartbeat. It is painfully apparent at this point that the only conclusion to be drawn is you just want to have the last word. Well, feel free to respond to this with yet another misguided, baseless jumble of words where you admit you were wrong but then, again, argue that you weren't wrong (somehow), and I'll gladly let you have it.