Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New articles
New media comments
New article comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
Contact us
Close Menu
Are you a Tarantula hobbyist? If so, we invite you to join our community! Once you join you'll be able to post messages, upload pictures of your pets and enclosures and chat with other Tarantula enthusiasts.
Sign up today!
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
G.rosea tree spider.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="garrim" data-source="post: 51084" data-attributes="member: 3997"><p>Where exactly is it that out of the two of us I am "clearly wrong in parts"? It is not a matter of opinion that I am 100% correct, it's a fact. No matter how I went about pointing it out, you weren't clear, and I said as much. That's all any of this, for me, was about. There is no dispute there, you've admitted you weren't clear, you know you weren't. That's the end of it.</p><p></p><p>Now... what is there to drop? If you keep responding to me about the same topic, I am going to respond back about said topic. That's how it works. I was ready to move on after my second post in this thread, but you responded in a way that invited a response back, over and over again. Why am I just supposed to not respond to whatever you say to me? How does that make sense? Those are all rhetorical questions, in case that is not clear to you.</p><p></p><p>Believe me when I say I am very sorry I <em>ever</em> came across your thread and saw your poorly worded post. If I could take back ever bothering to respond, I would in a heartbeat. It is painfully apparent at this point that the only conclusion to be drawn is you just want to have the last word. Well, feel free to respond to this with yet another misguided, baseless jumble of words where you admit you were wrong but then, again, argue that you weren't wrong (somehow), and I'll gladly let you have it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="garrim, post: 51084, member: 3997"] Where exactly is it that out of the two of us I am "clearly wrong in parts"? It is not a matter of opinion that I am 100% correct, it's a fact. No matter how I went about pointing it out, you weren't clear, and I said as much. That's all any of this, for me, was about. There is no dispute there, you've admitted you weren't clear, you know you weren't. That's the end of it. Now... what is there to drop? If you keep responding to me about the same topic, I am going to respond back about said topic. That's how it works. I was ready to move on after my second post in this thread, but you responded in a way that invited a response back, over and over again. Why am I just supposed to not respond to whatever you say to me? How does that make sense? Those are all rhetorical questions, in case that is not clear to you. Believe me when I say I am very sorry I [I]ever[/I] came across your thread and saw your poorly worded post. If I could take back ever bothering to respond, I would in a heartbeat. It is painfully apparent at this point that the only conclusion to be drawn is you just want to have the last word. Well, feel free to respond to this with yet another misguided, baseless jumble of words where you admit you were wrong but then, again, argue that you weren't wrong (somehow), and I'll gladly let you have it. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
G.rosea tree spider.
Top