Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New articles
New media comments
New article comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
Contact us
Close Menu
Are you a Tarantula hobbyist? If so, we invite you to join our community! Once you join you'll be able to post messages, upload pictures of your pets and enclosures and chat with other Tarantula enthusiasts.
Sign up today!
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
Ban of exotic pets?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Padraig Sea" data-source="post: 209546" data-attributes="member: 14430"><p>Here is the actual text of the Lacey amendment in this bill. It makes massive changes to an already overbroad and bad law that’s enforced arbitrarily and capriciously already. </p><p></p><p>Takeaways are that USFWS could bad an interstate transport of any non-native species it sees fit overnight. There would be no public review, and because this would be codified in law there would be effectively no way to stop them.</p><p></p><p>Note that this isn’t the ESA - it doesn’t just apply to commerce. Bringing a listed animal over state lines to visit a vet would be a violation. </p><p></p><p>It also effectively ends imports as we know if. The law creates a “white list” of species that USFWS decides you are allowed to import. I can tell you based on years of experience and dozens of imports that they want excuses to say <strong>no, </strong>not yes.</p><p></p><p>Thank you to those of you who’ve reached out to legislators. Please continue doing so, and please follow industry groups like USARK for actions you can take as the Senate reviews this bill and, hopefully, strips out this hobby killer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Padraig Sea, post: 209546, member: 14430"] Here is the actual text of the Lacey amendment in this bill. It makes massive changes to an already overbroad and bad law that’s enforced arbitrarily and capriciously already. Takeaways are that USFWS could bad an interstate transport of any non-native species it sees fit overnight. There would be no public review, and because this would be codified in law there would be effectively no way to stop them. Note that this isn’t the ESA - it doesn’t just apply to commerce. Bringing a listed animal over state lines to visit a vet would be a violation. It also effectively ends imports as we know if. The law creates a “white list” of species that USFWS decides you are allowed to import. I can tell you based on years of experience and dozens of imports that they want excuses to say [B]no, [/B]not yes. Thank you to those of you who’ve reached out to legislators. Please continue doing so, and please follow industry groups like USARK for actions you can take as the Senate reviews this bill and, hopefully, strips out this hobby killer. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
Ban of exotic pets?
Top