Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New articles
New media comments
New article comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Articles
New articles
New comments
Search articles
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
Contact us
Close Menu
Are you a Tarantula hobbyist? If so, we invite you to join our community! Once you join you'll be able to post messages, upload pictures of your pets and enclosures and chat with other Tarantula enthusiasts.
Sign up today!
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
B. Dubia question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MassExodus" data-source="post: 55481" data-attributes="member: 4086"><p>Ok, you devil <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />, but where is the payoff? What did we learn from it? That a colony of omnivores will eventually eat a spider that's molting and defenseless? We have to assume that's what happened, correct? I imagine they didn't all just attack a spider that was awake and aware, in a mob. It's not surprising, to me at least..roaches are opportunistic feeders. Were the roaches being fed regularly? What were the controls for this experiment? Any omnivore will eat a molting spider if it's starving..does that mean one of my fat, well fed dubias will try it, by itself, in a strange enclosure? I just don't think so, I think roaches are smarter than crickets.. And yes, communals can work...but what's the point? Where is the benefit from a communal, what is the risk, and what is the gain? Are these experiments for the sake of curiosity? What we're talking about is experimentation with living things for the sake of curiosity, with no real reward, for the species or for ourselves. We all know that communals can work, or work for a while and then end badly, it's already been done...And yeah, the guy bred the slings for himself, and his spiders are his, to do with as he pleases. Would people feel the same way if it was a dog in this little experiment? Or would he go to jail for animal cruelty? I know there's a line there, but it's thin, very thin. It's a matter of semantics I suppose, how you view other living things. People who like to keep roaches as pets probably would hate the fact that I feed them to my spiders on a regular basis. But they're well fed and happy until their sudden end, and the payoff is a well fed and happy bunch of spiders. So it's not like I'm killing them because I think it's interesting to observe what might happen...see what I mean? If someone is going to do experiments and research that could kill one of their pets, it should at least have some kind of valid, beneficial reward. Nothing was gained here, in either of the experiments listed above. Your rebuttal? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MassExodus, post: 55481, member: 4086"] Ok, you devil ;), but where is the payoff? What did we learn from it? That a colony of omnivores will eventually eat a spider that's molting and defenseless? We have to assume that's what happened, correct? I imagine they didn't all just attack a spider that was awake and aware, in a mob. It's not surprising, to me at least..roaches are opportunistic feeders. Were the roaches being fed regularly? What were the controls for this experiment? Any omnivore will eat a molting spider if it's starving..does that mean one of my fat, well fed dubias will try it, by itself, in a strange enclosure? I just don't think so, I think roaches are smarter than crickets.. And yes, communals can work...but what's the point? Where is the benefit from a communal, what is the risk, and what is the gain? Are these experiments for the sake of curiosity? What we're talking about is experimentation with living things for the sake of curiosity, with no real reward, for the species or for ourselves. We all know that communals can work, or work for a while and then end badly, it's already been done...And yeah, the guy bred the slings for himself, and his spiders are his, to do with as he pleases. Would people feel the same way if it was a dog in this little experiment? Or would he go to jail for animal cruelty? I know there's a line there, but it's thin, very thin. It's a matter of semantics I suppose, how you view other living things. People who like to keep roaches as pets probably would hate the fact that I feed them to my spiders on a regular basis. But they're well fed and happy until their sudden end, and the payoff is a well fed and happy bunch of spiders. So it's not like I'm killing them because I think it's interesting to observe what might happen...see what I mean? If someone is going to do experiments and research that could kill one of their pets, it should at least have some kind of valid, beneficial reward. Nothing was gained here, in either of the experiments listed above. Your rebuttal? :) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tarantula Forum Topics
General Tarantula Discussion
B. Dubia question
Top